The PPE Collaborative engages in a wide range of research and consultation activities aimed at supporting high-quality engagement in health research and health systems and policy decision making. We work with governments, health system organizations, citizen and patient partners and researchers provincially, nationally and around the world. This page outlines some of the larger PPE Collaborative projects that are currently underway and/or have been completed. Our work falls into three main categories: Developing frameworks, tools, and measures for supporting and evaluating PPE; evaluating PPE in health system decision making and research and, eliciting public and patient values on various health policy topics.
In 2018, we worked with HQO to assist with the development of measures to evaluate the impact of their patient partnering work. This project included a review of the published and grey literature to identify potential measures, collaboration with some of HQO’s patient partners and staff to refine the measures under consideration, and recommendations for a set of measures that could be used to evaluate the impact of patient partnering within their organization and beyond. HQO is currently implementing the newly created measures.
The PPEET was developed by the PPE Collaborative to serve as a common evaluation tool for health system organizations across Canada and internationally who are engaging the public and patients in their work. The tool was updated in summer 2018 following an implementation study evaluating the feasibility of the tool across a variety of health system organizations in Ontario. More information about the PPEET is available here.
Download the PPEET
The PPE Collaborative partnered with the Centre for Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public (CEPPP) to develop the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Toolkit. The toolkit is an electronic resource designed for practitioners of the health sector, produced after the completion of a rigorous systematic review of patient and public engagement evaluation tools. The toolkit includes a wide range of tools to assist with the evaluation of public and patient engagement initiatives, both in health research and in health care.
The PPE Collaboration worked in partnership with the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) and Health Quality Ontario (HQO) to develop a comprehensive framework for involving the public and patients in health technology assessment. The development of the framework involved a synthesis of international practice and published literature, a dialogue with local, national and international stakeholders, and the deliberations with the patient engagement sub-committee of OHTAC. This work informed the development of HQO's Patient Partnering Framework.
This work was awarded the 2017 Egon Jonsson Award at a ceremony in Rome on June 2017 in recognition of excellence in contributions made to the International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. The award is given annually by Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) to the authors of an outstanding paper in the society's official journal published over the past year.
The role of patient advisors in research is quickly expanding as researchers identify the value in working with individuals who have lived experiences and knowledge of the health systems and conditions that they study, and as funding agencies begin to require partnerships with patients. Through partnerships with research groups and networks, the PPE Collaborative has evaluated patient engagement efforts within research projects and networks.
The Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is a CIHR SPOR-funded pan-Canadian collaboration of patients, researchers, healthcare professionals, educators, industry and government policy advisors to direct new research in chronic pain, train researchers and clinicians, and translate findings into knowledge and policy. The PPE Collaborative is evaluating the patient engagement component of this network using a combination of key informant interviews, document reviews, and surveys.
The iCAN-ACP Project is a 3-year national study that aims to introduce and evaluate advance care planning tools with the aims of encouraging more, earlier and better conversations between older adults, families and the health care team about preferences for end of life care that fits with individuals values. The project, funded by the Canadian Frailty Network, brings together 32 investigators from 16 universities, five international collaborators and 42 partner organizations. The Project has included patient partners in their work. The PPE Collaborative evaluated the patient engagement component of the iCAN-ACP study.
A key focus of the PPE Collaborative's research is on exploring and elucidating citizen values on health policy topics. Deliberation methods are commonly used in these types of studies where citizens from a variety of backgrounds come together to discuss and seek common ground on how to address challenging health policy topics. As part of their deliberations, participants consider evidence shared on the topic while reflecting on personal values and trade-offs between different scenarios put forward. The PPE Collaborative has studied a variety of topics using this approach. Some of these studies are highlighted below.
In partnership with the McMaster Health Forum and the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, the PPE Collaborative was awarded funding from the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer to engage Canadians in order to better inform decision-making about cancer drug funding. Six public deliberations were held across Canada to develop recommendations to guide cancer drug funding decisions.
The PPE Collaborative formed the CRPHT to inform the work of the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) at Health Quality Ontario (HQO). The CRPHT was formed to elicit public and citizens' societal and ethical values that should guide OHTAC in developing its recommendations on specific topics. The panel included 14-members - one from each of Ontario's Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) to allow for geographic representation - and selected to ensure diversity in age groups and gender.
Five structured deliberations were held on a variety of topics relevant to the health technology assessments (HTAs) OHTAC had underway. The results of the deliberations were shared with OHTAC and usefully informed HTA decisions.
In recent years, emerging evidence on mammography screening has questioned the relative benefits and risks of screening average-risk women for breast cancer. This has led to an increased emphasis on informed decision-making as many screening guidelines acknowledge that there is no clear 'right' or 'wrong’ decision about mammography screening and women need to make screening decisions based on their own values. Little attention has been paid to directly eliciting women's perspectives in this area. Little attention has been paid, however, to women's perspectives on mammography screening and informed decision-making. This project aimed to address that gap through a series of citizen deliberations and a population-level survey of screen-eligible women.
The purpose of the Transformation Project is to measure and improve the performance of primary care in Canada. Dr. Julia Abelson partnered with Dr. Sharon Johnston from the University of Ottawa to lead one of four studies within the pan-Canadian project. Which explored the best methods for reporting the results of primary health care performance to different groups of stakeholders; providers, patients and decision-makers. To achieve this, six deliberative dialogues were held across three provinces (Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia).